Using AI to generate content? The story of CNET’s downfall will be an eye-opener

Wikipedia placed the publication in the Generally Unreliable list

3 min. read

Published onMarch 4, 2024

published onMarch 4, 2024

Share this article

Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help Windows Report sustain the editorial teamRead more

WhenFuturismfirst broke the news that CNET, a major web publication, is employing AI-based tools to generate entire articles, which surprisingly had high plagiarism and grammatical errors, everyone knew this would have implications!

As it turns out, Wikipedia has now down downgraded the website from beingGenerally reliableinpre-2020toGenerally unreliableat present. This, of course, is a downside of using AI-generated content without necessary checks in place.

The CNET and AI story

Back in 2022, whenCNET, operated byRed Ventures, reportedly first quietly pushed AI-generated articles, the company didn’t add a distinguishable disclaimer. Rather, it was included in a dropdown menu. This was highlighted byGael BretononX(formerly Twitter).

Looks like@CNET(DR 92 tech site) just did their coming out about using AI content for SEO articles.pic.twitter.com/CR0IkgUUnq

At first, Google did reward such articles, and they enjoyed the top spots in search results. Since then, things have somewhat changed!

Google, on its part, is not entirely against the use of AI to generate content. Its primary objective is to deliver results that best describe or explain the searched query. So, as long as the content is of high value, Google won’t consider the origin.

However, in theSearch Central documentation, Google states that AI content created with the aim of manipulating SERP is in violation of the existing policy.

Note that if you are relying on artificial intelligence, it’s imperative to add a disclaimer that the article is generated using AI and describe the extent. This is the recommended approach by Google.

Coming to the present day, CNET’s experiment with AI, in our opinion, has been a failure. After Wikipedia, other similar platforms and general users will stop trusting the publication!

Also, Wikipedia, as opposed to the common notion, remains a trusted source of information. While it does allow anyone tomake edits, the community running the platform asks for citations and sources for any changes made. So, its actions against CNET were in the right spirit.

AI-generated content has long troubled both publishers who believe in organic content and readers who want to get first-hand, experience-based information. Given how things are going, we may see Google and other search engines bring in more stringent checks!

Another concern is the use of content to train AI-based models.Microsoft and Open AI are being suedfor the same reason!

What do you think about the use of AI in content generation? Share your thoughts in the comment section.

With KB5043178 to Release Preview Channel, Microsoft advises Windows 11 users to plug in when the battery is low#

Copilot in Outlook will generate personalized themes for you to customize the app#

Microsoft will raise the price of its 365 Suite to include AI capabilities#

Death Stranding Director’s Cut is now Xbox X|S at a huge discount#

Outlook will let users create custom account icons so they can tell their accounts apart easier#

Using AI to generate content? The story of CNET’s downfall will be an eye-opener#

The CNET and AI story#

With KB5043178 to Release Preview Channel, Microsoft advises Windows 11 users to plug in when the battery is low

Copilot in Outlook will generate personalized themes for you to customize the app

Microsoft will raise the price of its 365 Suite to include AI capabilities

Death Stranding Director’s Cut is now Xbox X|S at a huge discount

Outlook will let users create custom account icons so they can tell their accounts apart easier

Using AI to generate content? The story of CNET’s downfall will be an eye-opener

The CNET and AI story